Colossus, Covid, and Maximizing Claim Value

Colossus And CovidIn recent months, COVID-19 has changed how our world interacts. We have all become acutely aware that we need to actively take steps to protect ourselves. Unfortunately, insurers have used the social and civil situation to accelerate their software-based tactics to devalue client's claims.

If you've been in a car accident or suffered a personal injury, the COVID crisis has made it even more important to have representation knowledgeable in Colossus and related programs.

The Insurer's Strategy

So how do COVID conditions relate to Colossus and insurance claims? It's a simple extension of the insurer's original scorched-earth policy. Allstate originally formulated Colossus as part of a two-tiered strategy that they developed with McKinsey & Co., a leading consulting firm. First, Allstate used Colossus to devalue claims. Then, they fought tooth and nail on every case, even small cases.

Attorneys were forced to spend excessive time and money for every single victory, eating through potential client proceeds. Allstate was betting that, over time, attorneys would stop taking many kinds of auto accident cases, leaving the insurers free to give their deliberately devalued offers and leaving accident victims with no recourse. Allstate's gamble largely paid off, and the current trends in claim values and litigation are a direct result.

COVID Complications

COVID has only emboldened the insurance companies' strategy of forcing litigation. Now, they can use Colossus and other programs to devalue claims even more than before, betting that victims will not take the claims to court.

Courts closed when social distancing and lockdowns began. Enormous backlogs quickly developed, and the full extent of the impact is still not clear. The entire legal system had to figure out a way to run when concern over contagions was of primary importance. It's still a work in progress, and we commend all the brave people in our court system who tirelessly and thanklessly labor to keep the machinery of our society running, even in the face of fear.

The insurers, however, have used this situation to their advantage. With the backlog of the court system, insurers have a reasonable expectation that the long and often grueling litigation process will only be made longer and more grueling.

As the ensuing economic calamity affects large swaths of our society, insurers are betting that injured people will take whatever immediate settlement they can get, simply to make ends meet. Accordingly, this strategy disproportionately impacts the already economically-disadvantaged portions of our society.

These practices are so rampant that the insurance department has taken notice. On May 14, 2020, the Insurance Commissioner promulgated a notice stating that the Department of Insurance was aware of what insurers were up to and clearly defined penalties unfair settlement practices.

However, insurance companies know that any amount of penalties is a vanishingly small expense. Large insurers often view regulatory penalties as a tiny, necessary cost to make much more money by using software and societal conditions to devalue claims.

Fighting Back

Understanding how the claim valuation system works is crucial to leveling the playing field, especially in these times. If we understand how the software is being used to devalue claims, then we can tailor our efforts to target the parts of the system that give the most value to our clients. The best result is to circumvent the insurance company's tactics by giving the system the inputs that will generate a fair and proper settlement. In an ideal situation, we can properly present specific kinds of claim and injury information that the system and the adjuster can't ignore. Sometimes, though, this isn't enough. In such situations, we file in court and keep track of the insurance company's bad faith negotiation tactics. To the insurers, it's just business, but the human beings in a jury will understand that a "business" decision made another human being suffer in order to save a corporation a small amount of money. Thus, even with the backlogged courts, clients will still see immeasurable benefit from Colossus-savvy representation.

No Code, No Cash - Devaluing Claims with Diagnosis Codes

The Colossus devaluation strategy starts with ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes. The ICD-10 is the 10th version of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, a medical classification list maintained by the World Health Organization.

The ICD-10 codes are combinations of letters and numbers that correspond to a specific injury. Using the codes allows for medical data tracking across borders and language barriers, allowing for a better understanding of injuries and treatments. When a doctor diagnoses an injury and notes it in a patient's medical records, the doctor can simply state what the injury is, or they can also use the ICD-10 Diagnosis Code.

Some doctors resist using the codes because it is another level of time and expertise that would otherwise detract from their practice. Many doctors use the ICD-10 codes because they know insurance companies look for them. Other medical providers will even hire specific staff for this "Medical Coding." However, it's not the law. It's an insurance company's internal practice that we have to learn to navigate to our client's advantage.

When the adjuster inputs an ICD-10 code into Colossus, the system converts it into a Colossus injury factor. These internal factors have a relative value of "severity points" assigned to them by the Colossus programmers. Therefore, Colossus will not pay for an injury if the treating physician doesn't use the ICD-10 code. It's as simple as, "No code, no cash."

This means that your doctor can diagnose you with legitimate whiplash and injuries to your cervical ligaments, but the adjuster won't give any value for it if the doctor doesn't include the diagnosis code. To compound the problem, adjusters often do their best to avoid revealing exactly what is giving the claim a certain value.

Requiring Expensive Specialist Diagnoses

Even if the doctor provides the correct ICD-10 codes, Colossus and other programs won't recognize specific diagnosis codes unless a specialist makes the diagnosis. For example, a program called Exposure Manager will not recognize a brain injury diagnosis from a neurologist. It will only consider the diagnosis if a neuropsychologist makes an ICD-10 coded diagnosis.

Colossus doesn't evaluate brain injuries, but without a demonstrable sign, the adjuster may not even acknowledge the injury in a non-Colossus portion of the claim. Since only about 10% of mild traumatic brain injuries have a neurological sign, the injured person is often given short shrift.

The adjusters often won't reveal what is holding down the value. The way the insurance company looks at these matters, it is in their best interest to obfuscate the information as much as possible to get the injured person to settle the claim for less than that it's worth. Complicating the matter, the insurance companies most often refuse to disclose the limits of the policy. There's usually no way to tell if there are enough policy funds to pay for the rapidly
increasing costs necessary to get a fair value out of the Colossus system. The cost of these specialists can quickly spiral to truly staggering heights.

Many injured people will not want to take the risk of expensive treatment if there is no guarantee of policy coverage, especially with the known attitude of insurers. This kind of obfuscation is an unfortunately ubiquitous tactic the insurance companies use to devalue claims and dissuade clients from pursuing their claims.

Paying Less for Treatments

Paying less for medical treatments is another way insurers use Colossus and other programs to devalue claims. Procedures like medical imaging can be expensive, especially if performed at a hospital in an emergency setting. It's common to see an MRI or CT Scan cost $5,000 or more. Emergency room visits are even more expensive. Hospitals will often apply "Trauma Designation" protocols to patients of car accidents. These trauma designations can cost over $15,000 as a single billing item, and they can increase the cost of any other procedures done at the hospital.

From the patient and the hospital's point of view, it makes sense. Someone who was injured in a car accident has a higher likelihood of a traumatic injury, so extra steps must be taken to diagnose and treat any traumatic injury as fast as possible. Emergency rooms often apply these protocols just in case someone has severe damage.

In many cases, the emergency room medical imaging and examinations reveal only soft tissue injuries. The hospital and patient both breathe a sigh of relief and know that they were better off safe than sorry. At the same time, the insurance company begins to cut corners on claim payout, at the direct expense of the injured person.

The insurers have a simple way to deal with this problem. Rather than pay for the medical treatment as billed by the provider, Colossus has a "reasonable and customary" amount that it deems each procedure is worth.

If the hospital charged $5,000 for CT Scan, it's all too common for an insurance company to give it a value of $600-800. What's more, many insurance companies will simply not honor Trauma Designation charges. With each line item payout reduced in this way, the overall payout amount drastically decreases.

No Payments for Pain

Colossus's severity point system does not give any payment rating for pain or suffering. The severity points supposedly have the pain value already included. By devaluing the amount of money paid out on the medical billings, Colossus decreases the weighted value of each remaining severity point.

By the time all the reductions are factored in, many Colossus claim values will not even cover the medical billings of the injured person. Without Colossus-savvy representation fighting back on their behalf, injured people can be left in the dark and holding the bag on injury claims. At, our injury lawyers know just what Colossus is looking for. We use our decades of combined experience to leverage the right information to get the correct result. If the insurance company doesn't do right, then they're in for a fight.

Next time, we will take a closer look at one of the best ways to get a favorable result from Colossus: Permanent Impairment Ratings.

Photo by CDC on Unsplash:MH cha [cs 1713]
Client Reviews
"Me and my wife; had a car accident. We were amazed how easy, professional, friendly attorney Ed Smith is along with his staff. Everybody is amazing. Thank you so much, we are very impressed!" Alex & Dinah M.
"Ed Smith and his office team took on a difficult personal injury case on my behalf and for the passenger in my car. Ed is a top- notch attorney. His staff couldn't have been more helpful and kind. No need to look elsewhere. I give Ed Smith my highest recommendation." Beverly
"Ed and Robert have been taking great care of my husband and I for the past 5+ years. They are always there when you have a problem and a quick resolution! Even when the issues have nothing to do with them. They are willing to help ease the pain off your shoulders. They are as good as it gets! Thank you again for everything." Annie T.
"Very professional. Great team, staff and service all around. Mr Smith was very honest, straight forward with his advice. He gives the word "attorney" an honest reputation. I will seek his council anytime, and would recommend him at the drop of a dime." Jeremy M.
"I would highly recommend Ed Smith to any friends or family in need of a personal injury attorney. Ed, and his staff, are very caring on top of being very experienced in this field. The staff always keeps you informed of the status of your case and they are always easy to reach by phone." Shannon D.
"Edward Smith law offices provide competent, thorough, and personable help for victims of personal injury. When you first meet the staff you know you contacted the right office. This law office treats clients like people. I recommend this office to anyone seeking representation regarding personal injury." David M.