Defective Olympus Scopes linked to Deadly Infection

Defective Olympus Scopes linked to Deadly Infection

I'm Ed Smith, a Sacramento defective medical device lawyer. A leading problem on the rise in hospitals worldwide is wrongful death from hospital-acquired infections linked to Olympus America Inc. duodenoscopes.

A common scope used in endoscopy procedures has been linked to the outbreak of “Superbugs” that have resulted in the tragic death of patients worldwide. These scopes, called more specifically duodenoscopes, are used for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures (ERCP). During an ERCP procedure while the patient is under sedation the doctor takes a black, flexible tube down the patient's mouth, esophagus, and small intestines into the bile and pancreatic ducts for diagnosis or removal of stones or tissue. The duodenoscopes help with the most minimally invasive access to these areas usually for life-saving needs such as diagnosing cancer or removal of gall stones after the gallbladder has been removed. This duodenoscope is different than other scopes used for routine colonoscopies because it is a side-viewing scope. It is this particular mechanism called the elevator, a metal device below the camera, that allows the scope to view from the side and makes it possible to find its way into hard reaching angled areas like the bile duct. This mechanism on the Olympus scope is in question since it seems to harbor bacteria such as "superbugs" even after being properly cleaned.

Superbugs

We hear the term "superbugs" in medicine today often but what are they and why are they so deadly? These infections are rare but very problematic since the bacteria is not curable with almost all current antibiotics. These scopes are questionable in design and/or cleaning techniques with the outbreaks of "superbugs" such as Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). The most commonly known antibiotic-resistant bacteria is Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a contagious staph infection, but in these particular infections, we are seeing CRE leading to wrongful death after ERCP procedures. 

Initial Problems

Olympus, Fujifilm, and Pentax all manufacture duodenoscopes, but Olympus has been under scrutiny since 2012 for their duodenoscopes being linked to the spread of infection and that lead to the death of ERCP patients. Over 500,000 ERCP procedures are performed a year with these duodenoscopes. Studies show this initial outbreak affected nine U.S. states with over 141 people infected in 3 short years before Olympus recalled this duodenoscope with model number TJF-Q180V in January 2016. The initial cases where an infection was found included a hospital in Pasadena where 16 people were infected and 11 died in 2015.  In the same year, 7 patients were reported infected and 3 patients died at UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center. Around this same time other hospitals in Southern California, Chicago, Connecticut, and Seattle declared similar findings with hundreds infected.

So why is this infection happening? Is it a problem with the manufacturing and design of the scope or is the scope not being properly cleaned or reprocessed? This question has been the root of the leading investigation for years and continues today. It may even be a combination of the two but either way viruses, very deadly viruses are being spread by this particular scope and wrongful death cases are more prevalent. Over the years the FDA and Olympus have emphasized proper cleaning but ultimately the root of the problem may have just been a design flaw.

This problem resulted in a proper recall by Olympus of this particular model number of their duodenoscopes in January of 2016 to replace the elevator mechanism on the scope that they admitted was not easily cleaned. In this mechanism, debris of tissues and bacteria was easily transmittable from patient to patient even if it was properly cleaned and sterilized. Olympus did also announce with the redesigned scope a call for yet again another new and stricter cleaning technique for this scope.

Problems with New Design

Doubt of Olympus' new design as an improvement from before has surfaced since foreign countries have recently reported infection occurrences. In July 2017, a woman in Seattle has won the first wrongful death case against Olympus scopes for the death of her husband. This case is winning the hearts of people all over the world who have been affected by the scope. Olympus is fighting many lawsuits now from patients and their families. We can only hope that this new design will be the fix we have been waiting for even if it is still too soon to tell.

Olympus has tried to take action and we hope that hospitals will follow proper infection control but if outbreaks of infection continue to occur leading to more wrongful deaths we may need to reassess even these new duodenoscope design as a defective medical tool.

Olympus has claimed that people are not following new cleaning procedure as directed with the recall and redesigning of the duodenoscope. Olympus may have knowingly failed to obtain and apply for FDA certification thereby putting patients at very serious risk before the recall in 2016 but has received FDA approval of the new design. The FDA and U.S. Justice Department are in an ongoing investigation of the scope as well to date.

What you should know if you need an ERCP

If you should be in need of an ERCP procedure in the future these are some things to know and be well informed of beforehand:

- Know your risks. Discuss thoroughly the risks, benefits, and alternatives of the procedure with your Doctor. Most of these patients in the cases listed above had not been properly informed or were aware of the risk of infection with these scopes.The risk of being infected and of dying from such a procedure is still low but knowing it is not zero risk will keep you alert for problems.

- Check the scope model number. Find out the model number of the ERCP scope that will be used. Like mentioned above, the model number TJF-Q180V has been linked to these particularly fatal infections and outbreaks and should have been recalled and redesigned.

- Ask about cleaning procedure. Talk with your doctor or the technicians involved in the use of the scope about their policies and procedure for infection control and reprocessing the scopes between patients to make sure cleaning and proper care and handling are being used at that facility.

- If you or a member of your family has suffered a severe infection after an ERCP duodonoscope procedure, consult an experienced defective medical device attorney to know your right to remedies.

 

Additional Articles:

Sacramento Defective Medical Device Lawyer

I’m Ed Smith, a Sacramento defective medical devices Lawyer. A leading problem on the rise in hospitals worldwide is wrongful death from hospital-acquired infections including those using Olympus duodenoscopes.

Death and hospital-acquired infections from faulty or defective medical devices in a common problem. If you believe you have been infected or know anyone who has suffered from such a defective product you can contact my office as soon as possible at (916) 921-6400 for free and friendly advice. My toll-free line is also available at (800) 404-5400.

I am honored to be included in the California State section of the forum for Million Dollar Advocates. Membership in this forum consists of legal professionals who are named as some of the nations top trial advocacy lawyers. The lawyers in this forum have either earned verdicts and agreed to settlements that have been worth at least $1 Million dollars.

Please look through my earlier verdicts and settlements.

Visitors can also read through some of my client ratings and reviews on:

Image Source: U.S. Food and Drug Administration

:mb bw [cs 1300] 8.20.17 >ab

Client Reviews
  • Me and my wife; had a car accident. We were amazed how easy, professional, friendly attorney Ed Smith is along with his staff. Everybody is amazing. Thank you so much, we are very impressed!
    Sincerely, Alex & Dinah M. ★★★★★
  • Ed Smith and his office team took on a difficult personal injury case on my behalf and for the passenger in my car. Ed is a top- notch attorney. His staff couldn't have been more helpful and kind. No need to look elsewhere. I give Ed Smith my highest recommendation. Beverly ★★★★★
  • Ed and Robert have been taking great care of my husband and I for the past 5+ years. They are always there when you have a problem and a quick resolution! Even when the issues have nothing to do with them. They are willing to help ease the pain off your shoulders. They are as good as it gets! Thank you again for everything. Annie T. ★★★★★
  • Very professional. Great team, staff and service all around. Mr Smith was very honest, straight forward with his advice. He gives the word "attorney" an honest reputation. I will seek his council anytime, and would recommend him at the drop of a dime. Jeremy M. ★★★★★
  • I would highly recommend Ed Smith to any friends or family in need of a personal injury attorney. Ed, and his staff, are very caring on top of being very experienced in this field. The staff always keeps you informed of the status of your case and they are always easy to reach by phone. Shannon D. ★★★★★
  • Edward Smith law offices provide competent, thorough, and personable help for victims of personal injury. When you first meet the staff you know you contacted the right office. This law office treats clients like people. I recommend this office to anyone seeking representation regarding personal injury. David M. ★★★★★