Loss Of Consortium Damages.

What To Do If You Have Loss of Consortium Damages

In the typical action for loss of consortium, the non-injured spouse will sue the defendant for damages resulting from his, or her, inability to enjoy the same companionship, love, and affection that he/she had prior to the spouse's injury. This legal claim tends to arise after one spouse is seriously injured or killed by a third party's negligent or intentional acts. Here, we'll discuss the details of how California law allows husbands and wives to recover damages for the said loss.

Loss of Consortium Damages | What You Should Know

In this article:

 
What Does Loss of Consortium Include?

Part of the damages for loss of consortium damages are losses suffered as a result of decreased or limited sexual activity between spouses. However, this type of damage covers much more. Basically, the non-injured spouse is compensated with the damages for the effects of the injury on previously existing spousal functions. As such, a claim for spousal consortium usually compensates the claimant spouse for loss or deprivation of the following:

  • services, such as caring for children and household chores
  • love
  • society
  • affection
  • companionship
  • emotional care and support
  • comfort; as well as
  • sexual relations

Even though a claim may include a decrease or change in sexual activity between spouses, the claim is usually much broader. In other words, a consortium is not limited to the couple's sexual relations. They largely include all those aspects listed above.

 
What Are Non-Economic Damages?

What Are Non-Economic Damages? | What To Do If You Have Loss of Consortium Damages

Keep in mind that consortium loss damages are considered "non-economic" damages. These damages do not involve an exact monetary loss, nor possess an objective cash value. As such, in a trial setting, an award for this loss is usually left to the discretion of the judge or jury. Legal experts maintain that these damages will most likely be awarded in cases involving a spouse who has died or who has been the victim of a severe injury. Loss of consortium damages are generally limited to these types of cases, and not cases involving “minor” physical injuries to the injured spouse, although the law does allow such claims.

 
What Does Loss of Consortium Mean in California?

In California, a valid marriage license at the time of the injury is a prerequisite to any claim for consortium loss. Further, California jury instructions explicitly define this loss as "loss of the spouse's love, companionship, comfort, affection, society, solace, or moral support; any loss or enjoyment of sexual relations or the ability to have children or any loss of the spouse's physical assistance in the operation and maintenance of the home..."

This means, that aside from the actual victim's personal injury case against the party, or parties, liable for his/her injuries, the victim's spouse can also sue the liable party, or parties, for those losses listed in the jury instruction. The spouse's case would be a claim for compensation for the loss of consortium he/she suffered that resulted from the victim's injuries.

 
Juries and Damages for Loss of Consortium

It is important to know that juries generally do not like a spouse who was not injured who is trying to collect damages based on minor physical injuries suffered exclusively by their husband/wife. Thus, even though this is an area for potential damages in any injury case where the injured individual is married, many lawyers will not ask for consortium loss damages on smaller cases for fear of a backlash against the uninjured spouse.

However, if it is a situation where there is a very serious injury, then the attorney may ask, and it is appropriate, for loss of consortium damages.

 

Here's a video about the loss of consortium from The Audiopedia:


Understanding the ins and outs of the loss of consortium damages is highly important if you feel like you're eligible. Although you have the chances of claiming one, it's still essential to consult an expert in the field for some legal advice. The process of claiming loss of consortium damages may be complicated, but it's still best to know you are on the right track.

 

Proud member of the Million Dollars Advocates Forum
See our Past Verdicts and Settlements page
Member of the Top 1%

 

Editor's Note — This article has been updated for accuracy and relevancy. 

Client Reviews
Me and my wife; had a car accident. We were amazed how easy, professional, friendly attorney Ed Smith is along with his staff. Everybody is amazing. Thank you so much, we are very impressed! Alex & Dinah M.
★★★★★
Ed Smith and his office team took on a difficult personal injury case on my behalf and for the passenger in my car. Ed is a top- notch attorney. His staff couldn't have been more helpful and kind. No need to look elsewhere. I give Ed Smith my highest recommendation. Beverly
★★★★★
Ed and Robert have been taking great care of my husband and I for the past 5+ years. They are always there when you have a problem and a quick resolution! Even when the issues have nothing to do with them. They are willing to help ease the pain off your shoulders. They are as good as it gets! Thank you again for everything. Annie T.
★★★★★
Very professional. Great team, staff and service all around. Mr Smith was very honest, straight forward with his advice. He gives the word "attorney" an honest reputation. I will seek his council anytime, and would recommend him at the drop of a dime. Jeremy M.
★★★★★
I would highly recommend Ed Smith to any friends or family in need of a personal injury attorney. Ed, and his staff, are very caring on top of being very experienced in this field. The staff always keeps you informed of the status of your case and they are always easy to reach by phone. Shannon D.
★★★★★
Edward Smith law offices provide competent, thorough, and personable help for victims of personal injury. When you first meet the staff you know you contacted the right office. This law office treats clients like people. I recommend this office to anyone seeking representation regarding personal injury. David M.
★★★★★