CORONAVIRUS UPDATE: What We Are Doing to Protect Our Clients

Failure to Display Flares Can Result in Negligence

yellow truckCases involving semi-trucks and trailers can be difficult. If you are injured in a motor vehicle collision caused by a commercial vehicle, or a semi-truck, it is vital to consult with a semi-truck accident attorney as early as possible to determine your rights and options.

When Large Commercial Trucks Break Down

Often cases involve commercial vehicles or semi-trucks which have broken down or parked on the shoulders of roadways, without the proper use of flares or other safety devices such as reflective cones. Many dangerous conditions have occurred, particularly at night, when trucks are stalled on the side of the road and are difficult for drivers of vehicles to see the truck until it is too late and a collision cannot be avoided. Other prevalent cases involve parked commercial vehicles that block the vision of drivers from clearly seeing oncoming traffic. Many horrible, catastrophic accidents have occurred when parked semi-trucks obscure the view of drivers until it is too late.

Rules and Regulations Regarding the Use of Display Flares

Several jurisdictions have specific rules and regulations regarding the use of display flares, and many cases have interpreted those laws. In the following circumstances detailed below, a violation of a flare statute resulted in a finding of negligence as a matter of law.

In one instance a truck driver could not pass a stalled truck in front of him because snow and ice on the road led him to believe that his truck would slide into the other, so he parked his vehicle partially on the highway and went to the assistance of the other driver but failed to put out flares. Failure to use flares in this instance led to a finding of fault. See Gies v. Consolidated Freightways, 244 P.2d 248.

In another case, a truck driver left his stalled truck partly on the shoulder and partly on the roadway before daylight either with no flares or one-half the required statutory distance from his truck. Failure to properly use flares and following the law pertinent to the same led to liability. See Inter-City Trucking Co. v. Daniels, 178 S.W.2d 756.

Another case involved a truck driver who left his truck in an underpass for fifteen to twenty minutes to find a way to reduce the height of his load without putting out flares. By disregarding a statute requiring the use of flares in this instance, the truck driver was found at fault for harm caused by a collision. See Luis v. Cavins, 88 Cal. App. 2d 107.

In another situation, a truck was stalled on the highway at night, and the driver failed to put out flares. A court found that the truck driver was at fault for a collision caused at least in part by the failure to put out flares. See Burnes v. Fisher, 313 P.2d 1044

Similarly, a truck owner in another jurisdiction failed to put out warning devices because the area around the accident was so desolate that he did not think about warning anyone. The court determined that this excuse was no justification for failing to put out warning devices and held the truck owner negligent. See Murray v. O&A Express, Inc., 630 S.W.2d 633

In another case, a court determined that the driver of a disabled vehicle had a statutory duty to display warning devices even though a truck behind him was exhibiting its flashing emergency lights. See Smith v. Rorvik, 751 P.2d 1054

Cases Involving Non-Commercial Vehicles

There are also cases where non-commercial vehicles are held to the safety standards of commercial vehicles. One such case involved a city dump truck that was held to be a commercial vehicle that poses "special dangers to oncoming traffic," and therefore, must be in compliance with the statute. See Pruiss v. City of Springfield, 21 Mass. App. 960.

Similarly, in another case involving the driver of a wrecker truck, the court held the driver at fault where he left his truck on the pavement when there was ample room for safe parking off the pavement and failed to immediately put out flares to warn oncoming traffic. See Hisan v. Hendrix, 54 N.M. 119.

Failure to Properly Equip Vehicles

Many cases involve failing to properly equip semi-trucks with necessary safety equipment. Simply by failing to adequately equip vehicles, courts have found liability. In one such instance, the owner of a truck who failed to equip it with flares, fuses and flags, was found negligent. See Trefzer v. Stiles, 56 N.M. 296.

In another case, a truck driver was found negligent when he failed to place red flags when he left his truck parked and unattended near the centerline of a wet highway. See Shuler v. Clabough, 274 S.W.2d 17.

Duty and Obligation of Truck Drivers and Vehicle Owners

In all the above cases, it is essential to keep in mind that commercial vehicle owners and drivers have an obligation and duty to properly equip and use flares and other various safety devices when parked or broken down on the side of a roadway. Many extremely hazardous situations are created by semi-truck owners and operators when they fail to follow the rules of the road, and various statutes, intended to keep the public at large from harm.

If you have been injured in an accident involving a parked or broken down semi-truck, it is important to talk to an experienced and knowledgeable commercial vehicle lawyer right away to determine your rights and options. Or, if you have been injured in a collision caused by a commercial vehicle that blocked your vision, also consider talking to an expert in trucking collisions as you might have a case against the vehicle that impeded your view.

The video below explains why trucking companies may be liable for a truck accident.

Sacramento Truck Accident Lawyer

I'm Ed Smith, a Sacramento Truck Accident Lawyer. You can call me for free, friendly advice at (916) 921-6400 or (800) 404-5400 if you've been in an accident involving a large truck.

We are members of the National Association of Distinguished Counsel and the Million Dollar Advocates Forum.

See our client reviews on GoogleYelp, and AVVO and our past verdicts and settlements.

Photo by Milovan Vudrag on Unsplash

:RS cha [cs 1062]

Client Reviews
★★★★★
"Me and my wife; had a car accident. We were amazed how easy, professional, friendly attorney Ed Smith is along with his staff. Everybody is amazing. Thank you so much, we are very impressed!" Alex & Dinah M.
★★★★★
"Ed Smith and his office team took on a difficult personal injury case on my behalf and for the passenger in my car. Ed is a top- notch attorney. His staff couldn't have been more helpful and kind. No need to look elsewhere. I give Ed Smith my highest recommendation." Beverly
★★★★★
"Ed and Robert have been taking great care of my husband and I for the past 5+ years. They are always there when you have a problem and a quick resolution! Even when the issues have nothing to do with them. They are willing to help ease the pain off your shoulders. They are as good as it gets! Thank you again for everything." Annie T.
★★★★★
"Very professional. Great team, staff and service all around. Mr Smith was very honest, straight forward with his advice. He gives the word "attorney" an honest reputation. I will seek his council anytime, and would recommend him at the drop of a dime." Jeremy M.
★★★★★
"I would highly recommend Ed Smith to any friends or family in need of a personal injury attorney. Ed, and his staff, are very caring on top of being very experienced in this field. The staff always keeps you informed of the status of your case and they are always easy to reach by phone." Shannon D.
★★★★★
"Edward Smith law offices provide competent, thorough, and personable help for victims of personal injury. When you first meet the staff you know you contacted the right office. This law office treats clients like people. I recommend this office to anyone seeking representation regarding personal injury." David M.