Crop Duster Accidents

crop duster

Compared to commercial planes, private planes, or helicopters, crop dusters probably seem relatively harmless. Used to “dust” crops with fungicides, pesticides, fertilizers, and more, crop dusters are flown at a comparatively low height (in regards to other aircraft) and relatively low speed. Regardless, accidents on crop dusters are common, and numerous crop duster pilots have died in crop duster crashes. If you or a loved one has been injured or killed in a Sacramento crop duster accident, working with an experienced Sacramento crop duster crash attorney can help you recover the compensation you deserve.

Why do Crop Duster Accidents Happen?

Of course, a crop duster accident can happen because of an error made by the person piloting the small plane – perhaps the pilot shows up to work intoxicated that day or fails to get enough sleep and is therefore fatigued to the point of impairment.

But most of the time, crop duster accidents happen due to factors that a pilot cannot predict and often cannot avoid. Obstacles that a crop duster pilot encounters along the route are typically the biggest threat to pilots’ safety. Obstacles that may be in a pilot’s way can include:

  • birds and animals
  • fence posts
  • wires and power lines
  • tree branches

Another significant risk to the pilots of crop dusters is buildings such as temporary meteorological towers. These towers, which can be constructed in a matter of hours and are 198 feet high, often catch pilots by surprise. Because the Federal Aviation Administration only requires warnings and markings for towers over 200 feet high, these towers avoid that requirement. As reported by an article in The New York Timessince the year 2003, at least five people, three of them crop duster pilots, have died in accidents after hitting the towers.

Mechanical Failures

In addition to hitting objects, crop duster accidents may also occur because of a mechanical failure of the plane or plane part. If crop dusters are not adequately maintained and properly repaired when a part breaks down, the risk of an accident becomes very real. Sometimes, crop duster parts are defectively designed or manufactured.

Who Is Liable for a Crop Duster Crash?

Liability for a crop duster crash can be confusing and depends upon several factors, including the parties involved and the specific cause of the crash. For example, if a crop duster crash occurred because of a private pilot’s negligence, and that pilot was the only one harmed in the crash, it is unlikely that the pilot or his family members will have a claim.

Others May Be Proven Negligent

On the other hand, if that pilot’s accident occurred because of the installation of a temporary meteorological tower, then the company who installed the tower or the landowner where the building was installed may be liable.

If the crop duster accident would not have occurred but for a mechanical failure or defect that would have been prevented but for poor design, manufacture, maintenance, or repair, then the manufacturer of the part or the party responsible for the restoration of the part may be held liable. In some cases, the party who sold the part may be responsible.

Representing You and Your Family after a Crop Duster Crash

If you or a loved one has been injured in a crop duster crash, finding out what happened, who should be held liable and figuring out a way to recover your full compensation amount are indeed top priorities. Doing all three of these things will require an intensive investigation into what went wrong, whether or not negligence or wrongful act was committed, and a valuation of all damages suffered.

In California, a person who is injured due to negligence – be that a private company, an individual, a property owner, a corporation, or even the government – has the right to seek damages for their losses. While a claim must be filed within two years, per California’s statute of limitations, an injured person may seek damages for their:

  • medical expenses
  • permanent disability or disfigurement
  • pain
  • suffering
  • psychological injury
  • loss of guidance, companionship, or consortium
  • lost wages and benefits
  • loss of earning capacity
  • funeral and burial expenses
Is Filing a Claim Worth It?

When tragic accidents occur, many people wonder whether filing a claim and getting involved in a lawsuit is really worth it. The answer is simply that if you do not take action, it is unlikely that you will recover any compensation for your losses and certainly not the amount that you truly deserve. While the process of filing a civil action can be time-consuming and emotional, it is also often the only way to ensure that you have the financial means necessary to pay for your losses and move on with your life.

Working with a Sacramento Crop Duster Injuries Attorney

Another concern many people have is that they will have to work with an attorney who will cost them a fortune if they file a legal action. I’m Ed Smith, and when you work with me, I can guarantee you that there will be no upfront costs. Your initial consultation is 100 percent free, and I always work on a contingency basis. What this means is that I will work hard on your case to obtain the best outcome possible – then, rather than charging you upfront or out-of-pocket fees, you only pay me if I am successful with your case.

Nearly Four Decades of Experience

We know how scary it is to be in an accident and how terrible it is to lose a loved one. We know that you probably have reservations about calling us or filing a lawsuit. We have been working with accident victims in Sacramento and throughout Northern California since 1982 - if you are looking for an advocate you can trust, please contact us today.

The following video shows a fatal crop duster bi-plane accident in Kansas.

Sacramento Crop Duster Crash Lawyer

If you are injured in a crop duster crash, call our experienced Sacramento crop duster attorneys now at (916) 921-6400 or (800) 404-5400 for free, friendly advice. 

You may also reach us using this online form, and we will promptly get in touch with you.

We are members of the Million Dollar Advocates Forum and the National Association of Distinguished Counsel.

See our case history of verdicts and settlements and our client reviews on GoogleYelp, and Avvo.

Editor’s Note: This page has been updated for accuracy and relevancy [cha 3.4.22]

Client Reviews
★★★★★
"Me and my wife; had a car accident. We were amazed how easy, professional, friendly attorney Ed Smith is along with his staff. Everybody is amazing. Thank you so much, we are very impressed!" Alex & Dinah M.
★★★★★
"Ed Smith and his office team took on a difficult personal injury case on my behalf and for the passenger in my car. Ed is a top- notch attorney. His staff couldn't have been more helpful and kind. No need to look elsewhere. I give Ed Smith my highest recommendation." Beverly
★★★★★
"Ed and Robert have been taking great care of my husband and I for the past 5+ years. They are always there when you have a problem and a quick resolution! Even when the issues have nothing to do with them. They are willing to help ease the pain off your shoulders. They are as good as it gets! Thank you again for everything." Annie T.
★★★★★
"Very professional. Great team, staff and service all around. Mr Smith was very honest, straight forward with his advice. He gives the word "attorney" an honest reputation. I will seek his council anytime, and would recommend him at the drop of a dime." Jeremy M.
★★★★★
"I would highly recommend Ed Smith to any friends or family in need of a personal injury attorney. Ed, and his staff, are very caring on top of being very experienced in this field. The staff always keeps you informed of the status of your case and they are always easy to reach by phone." Shannon D.
★★★★★
"Edward Smith law offices provide competent, thorough, and personable help for victims of personal injury. When you first meet the staff you know you contacted the right office. This law office treats clients like people. I recommend this office to anyone seeking representation regarding personal injury." David M.