Clergy Sexual Assault Lawyer

Picture of Edward A. Smith

The movie "Spotlight" is an incredible cinematic achievement highlighting the amazing work of reporters with the Boston Globe who pulled back the proverbial curtain on rampant sexual assault, abuse, and molestation of children by clergy. The number of victims is estimated to be at least 10,000, and many people believe that is a very conservative number. For example, Catholic priest Andrew Greeley predicted that the number of clergy sexual abuse victims was probably closer to 100,000. Psychologist Richard Sipe declared that roughly 6-8 percent of priests engaged in sexual abuse of minors. Currently, the number of abusers in the clergy is estimated to be, at a minimum, over 4,000 in total.

The children who were abused by priests and other clergymen now struggle with depression, social anxiety, alcohol abuse, and prescription medication abuse, and are even suicidal. The damage inflicted by abusive clergymen to thousands of young lives is practically incalculable.

Irony of Spotlight – Once It Disappeared, So Did Progress

After the Boston Globe released its landmark news report on clergy sexual abuse of kids, there was a sense that major reforms would be made to the Catholic Church and other religious institutions.

Unfortunately, when the actual spotlight on this issue disappeared, the proposed reforms got lost in state legislatures and "internal audits" by the Church.

The track record of success for legislatures and state prosecutors to address clergy sexual abuse is not exemplary. This has made clear that bringing the Catholic Church, and other religious institutions, to account for the plethora of children who were sexually abused and raped will need to take place in the civil arena of our judicial system, in addition to continued work by local activists and interest organizations.

I want to be clear that clergy abuse extends beyond just the Catholic Church. For example, 6,000 sexual abuse victims who were practicing Jehovah's Witnesses came forward to highlight the reprehensible acts of clergy members. The Lutheran Church has also been embroiled in clergy abuse litigation.

The Scope of This Problem is Hard to Fully Comprehend

Clergy sexual abuse is a public health, criminal, and civil law crisis. We still do not know, to this day, how many children were abused and how many clergymen were abusers. It appears one of the only ways the harm inflicted by clergymen will be addressed is by victims displaying incredible courage to come forward and take legal action against their church.

Catholic Church's Self-Audit is Woefully Inadequate

In a prime example of "move along, nothing to see here", the Catholic Church released a self-audit report of its internal investigation into clergy sexual abuse allegations. This audit was designed by the Church, paid for by the Church, and based on data exclusively controlled by the Church. For example, there are 4,600 members of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests. The Church reportedly only interviewed three members.

The self-audit is woefully inadequate and actually raises more questions than provides answers. For example, the Church allowed the Gavin Group, which is run by former FBI agents, to spend five days in individual dioceses in multiple areas. Members of the Gavin Group were permitted to read reports and were allowed to speak to only select individuals. Material deemed "confidential" by the Church was not reviewed.

The report is also incomplete in another way. Not all dioceses participated in the report. Only dioceses that failed to meet the guidelines set forth by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops for reporting and handling allegations of sexual abuse received field visits. The rest of the dioceses simply audited themselves, according to the Hartford Courier. Moreover, one-third of the nation's priests-- those in orders--are simply not covered by the Bishops' Charter, and thus are not covered by the self-audit.

For the dioceses that did participate, the report shows that there is disjointed and erratic compliance in areas critical to security and well-being of children involved with the Church. This means there is a continuing threat to children of being abused sexually.

Outside Reports Reveal Shocking Statistic

A report published by the John Jay College of Criminal Justice on sexual abuse by the Catholic Church's clergy over the last 50 years revealed a statistic - only 2 percent of clergymen have been incarcerated for sexual abuse. Imagine if only 2 percent of rapists were incarcerated. It's outrageous and highlights the fact that more needs to be done to hold clergy members, and the Church, responsible for their actions, or inaction.

Sunlight is a Good Disinfectant – How the Court System Can Help

The internal audits conducted by the Church are simply not enough. By operating in a cloak and dagger manner, the Church is only harming itself. These internal reviews and self-audits engender a culture where abuse is tolerated and abusers have every incentive to keep their victims quiet.

This is why it is so critical for a victim of clergy sexual abuse to contact a Sacramento sexual assault lawyer who can take up their cause and fight for justice by suing the Church for its negligence. When a lawsuit is filed, a process known as discovery is initiated. Discovery is the pre-trial phase in a lawsuit in which each party investigates the facts of a case. The rules of civil procedure, not the internal rules of the Church. The objective of discovery is to obtain evidence from the opposing party (i.e. the Church in this case) and others through discovery devices such as requests for answers to interrogatories, requests for production of documents and things, requests for admissions, and depositions. Let's take a look at each.

  • Interrogatories – This is a fancy word for questions. Interrogatories are written questions that are sent to the other party to be answered while under oath. The answers can be used at trial to challenge a party who may change their story later.
  • Depositions - In a deposition, your attorney will conduct face-to-face questioning of a witness or the other party to the case. As a sexual abuse survivor, you may not need to be in attendance during the deposition. The party being questioned (i.e. the deponent) is required to answer each question under oath. The responses are recorded so they can be used at trial, same as interrogatory responses.
  • Requests for production of documents - In a request for production of documents, one party asks the other for physical evidence related to the case. Requests for production are usually used to gather relevant documents that could be used at trial. For example, a clergy sexual abuse case may necessitate getting a copy of the clergymen's personnel file, any incident reports, and other pertinent records.
  • Requests for admission – This is where one party asks the other party to admit, under oath, that certain documents are legitimate or that certain facts are true. These types of requests are typically used to save time and to narrow the issues that have to be proved at a jury trial or bench trial.
Types of Abuse by Clergy

There are different types of abuse that may have been committed by clergy against your son or daughter. Clergy misconduct and sexual abuse may include the following:

  • Child molestation
  • Child pornography, indecent exposure
  • Lewd or lascivious acts with a minor
  • Statutory rape
  • Sexual threats or harassment of parishioners
  • Sexual assault
  • Touching without clothing
  • Unconsented touching
Civil Damages for Clergy Sex Abuse

When a civil lawsuit is filed against a defendant, the punishment is not jail time. For civil cases, the punishment is monetary in nature. The damages that may be recovered include economic damages, non-economic damages, and possibly punitive damages. Economic damages are those itemizable harms such as medical bills and lost income. Non-economic damages are often called "pain and suffering" damages. This is the type of harm many survivors of sexual abuse endure on a daily basis and where juries have awarded significant sums of money to clergy sexual abuse survivors. For example, a jury in Dallas, Texas awarded $120 million in damages to a sexual abuse victim after finding that the local Roman Catholic diocese ignored evidence that a priest was sexually abusing boys and that it had then tried to cover up the abuses, according to the New York Times. The damages were supposed to be paid by the diocese and the abusive priest, who was suspended from the priesthood. However, the priest was not considered to be solvent under Texas law, so the church was liable for the full amount.

Take Action - Ordinary Statute of Limitations Does Not Apply

If you were the victim of clergy sexual abuse, you may be thinking, "it happened so long ago, I probably cannot sue anymore. The statute of limitations must have expired." Not so. The usual statutes of limitations for filing lawsuits do not apply in cases involving sexual abuse of a minor. Courts have demonstrated an understanding of the unique nature of child sexual abuse. Typically, a child does not fully grasp what has happened or does not find sympathetic adults who will believe their story and take appropriate action. A lawyer can advise you on how to seek redress for wrongs done years ago.

Contact Sacramento Sexual Assault Attorney Ed Smith and His Firm Today

I’m Ed Smith, a Sacramento personal injury lawyer who has been practicing personal injury law since 1982. I have over 30 years of experience in the practice of injury law, including cases involving clergy sexual abuse. These types of cases are complex and sensitive, often involving a survivor to recount their abuse by a priest or other member of the clergy. That is why I make sure to treat clients like family, meaning I take an interest in your personal welfare. This is why we call ourselves the "personal" personal injury law firm. We take the time to really get to know you, your hopes, dreams and what you are expecting from the outcome of your case. Please call me today for free, friendly advice. I can be reached toll free at (800) 404-5400 or (916) 921-6400 locally.

Read my client reviews on Google+, Yelp, and Avvo (the attorney ranking service).

I am a member of the Million Dollar Advocates Forum. The forum is made up of top rated injury lawyers who have settled cases in excess of 1 Million Dollars.

See the results I have obtained for my clients on my past verdicts and settlements page.

:sb bw [cs 1768]

Client Reviews
  • Me and my wife; had a car accident. We were amazed how easy, professional, friendly attorney Ed Smith is along with his staff. Everybody is amazing. Thank you so much, we are very impressed!
    Sincerely, Alex & Dinah M. ★★★★★
  • Ed Smith and his office team took on a difficult personal injury case on my behalf and for the passenger in my car. Ed is a top- notch attorney. His staff couldn't have been more helpful and kind. No need to look elsewhere. I give Ed Smith my highest recommendation. Beverly ★★★★★
  • Ed and Robert have been taking great care of my husband and I for the past 5+ years. They are always there when you have a problem and a quick resolution! Even when the issues have nothing to do with them. They are willing to help ease the pain off your shoulders. They are as good as it gets! Thank you again for everything. Annie T. ★★★★★
  • Very professional. Great team, staff and service all around. Mr Smith was very honest, straight forward with his advice. He gives the word "attorney" an honest reputation. I will seek his council anytime, and would recommend him at the drop of a dime. Jeremy M. ★★★★★
  • I would highly recommend Ed Smith to any friends or family in need of a personal injury attorney. Ed, and his staff, are very caring on top of being very experienced in this field. The staff always keeps you informed of the status of your case and they are always easy to reach by phone. Shannon D. ★★★★★
  • Edward Smith law offices provide competent, thorough, and personable help for victims of personal injury. When you first meet the staff you know you contacted the right office. This law office treats clients like people. I recommend this office to anyone seeking representation regarding personal injury. David M. ★★★★★