Tentative Rulings Department 54 of California March 11, 2003




                                        NOTICE                               
                                                                             
              To request a hearing on any matter on this                    
     calendar, you must call the Court at (916) 874-7848                    
     (Department 54) by 4:00 p.m. today. Local rule 31(h). If               
     no call is made the tentative ruling becomes the order of              
     the court.                                                              


                               TENTATIVE RULINGS                         

                                 Department  54
                          Superior Court of California              
                          800 Ninth Street, 3rd Floor               
                               Joe S. Gray, Judge
                                S. Meeker, Clerk
                            Vivian Carroll, Bailiff
                             March 11, 2003, 09:00

     ITEM  1  01AS03552 GIL JONES VS. CORENE GARINO                                 
              Nature of Proceeding: Motion To Compel                   
              Filed By: LINN, iTAMARA J.                               


     The motion is granted, no opposition having been received by the Court. 
     Gil Jones is ordered to serve verified responses, without objections, to
     defendant Garino's Special Interrogatory, set one, ## 1 and 2, no later 
     than Friday, March 21, 2003.                                            
                                                                             
     The request for a monetary sanction is denied as the motion is          
     unopposed.                                                              
                                                                             
     This minute order is effective immediately.  No formal order is needed, 
     C.R.C. rule 391, nor is further notice of this ruling required.         
                                                                             
                                                                             

     ***

     ITEM  2  02AS00006 JOSEPH C. VENZIANO VS. MARGIE LEE DELPOZZO, ET AL           
              Nature of Proceeding: MOT FOR DETERMINATIN OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT               
              Filed By: READ, MICHAEL B.                               


     Based on the information submitted to the Court, the Court finds the    
     settlement between plaintiff and defendant Margie Lee Delpozzo for      
     defendant's policy limits of $250,000 is not in good faith.  The        
     evidence shows that the case is valued at $1,000,000.  Ms. DelPozzo's   
     proportionate share of liability is quite high and a settlement of      
     $250,000 does not meet the Tech-Bilt factors.  Although Ms. DelPozzo    
     asserts the $250,000 is the insurance policy limits, she has not        
     submitted any evidence as to any other assets she may have.             
                                                                             
     This minute order is effective immediately.  No formal order is needed, 
     C.R.C. Rule 391, nor is further notice of this ruling required.         
                                                                             



     Department 54
     March 11, 2003
     Page  2
     ______________


     ***

     ITEM  3  02AS03388 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY VS. THOMAS TUOHY, ET AL          
              Nature of Proceeding: MOTION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH STAY ORDER AND INJUNCTION        
              Filed By: PEARSE, CHARLETON S.                               


     Based on the principles of comity, the Court grants the request for a   
     stay.  This matter is stayed pending the resolution of the              
     rehabilitation proceedings in Pennsylvania or further order of this     
     Court.                                                                  
                                                                             
     This minute order is effective immediately.  No formal order is needed, 
     C.R.C. rule 391, nor is further notice of this ruling required.         

     ***

     ITEM  4  02AS04294 TIMOTHY B. JONES SR., ET AL VS. BRENT SHIELDS, ET AL        
              Nature of Proceeding: Demurrer                           
              Filed By: RUSSELL, EDWARD D.                               


     The demurrer to the entire amended complaint on the ground plaintiff has
     not alleged tender of amounts due is overruled.  Under the facts        
     alleged, tender is not required as to the causes of action for fraud,   
     breach of contract, declaratory relief and professional negligence.     
     Since some of the causes of action survive, the demurrer to the entire  
     first amended complaint must be overruled.                              
                                                                             
     The demurrer to the fourth cause of action, constructive fraud, is      
     overruled.  Based on the facts, constructive fraud is adequately plead. 
     Hatch v Collins (1990) 225 C.A.3d 1104.                                 
                                                                             
     The demurrer to the fifth cause of action, breach of contract, is       
     sustained without leave to amend as to defendants Fidelity and Faherty, 
     who are not alleged to be parties to the contract.                      
     The demurrer is sustained without leave to amend as to KLH, which is not
     a party to the contract.                                                
     The demurrer is overruled as to Bankers as the allegations are          
     sufficient to state a cause of action and the question of damages can   
     not be determined by demurrer.                                          
                                                                             
     The demurrer to the sixth cause of action, declaratory relief, is       
     overruled.  Plaintiffs have sufficiently alleged an actual controversy  
     among the parties.                                                      
                                                                             
     The demurrer to the seventh cause of action, negligence, is sustained   
     without leave to amend as to Bankers, as this cause of action is not    
     alleged against it.                                                     
     The demurrer to the seventh cause of action is otherwise overruled.     
     Defendants owe a duty to the trustor to conduct the sale with fairness, 
     openness and scrupulous integrity and it is alleged they did not.  Bank 
     of Seoul & Trust Co. v Maricone (1988) 198 C.A.3d 113.  Hatch v Collins,
     supra.                                                                  
                                                                             
     The demurrer to the eighth cause of action, breach of C.C.  2924h is   
     sustained without leave to amend as plaintiffs allegations do not state 
     a cause of action under that statute.                                   
                                                                             
     The demurrer to the ninth cause of action against KLH for breach of     
     contract, is sustained without leave to amend.  Plaintiffs have, in     
     conclusory fashion, alleged that only $129,472.34 was owed.  A demurrer 
     does not deem conclusions of fact to be true.  Furthermore, there are no
     allegations regarding the amount of expenses of the sale, including     
     Trustee's and attorney's fees, which are to be paid prior to applying   
     the proceeds of the sale to all sums secured by the security instrument.
                                                                             
                                                                             
     Defendants to file and serve their answer(s) no later than Friday, March
     21, 2003.                                                               
                                                                             
     This minute order is effective immediately.  No formal order is needed, 
     C.R.C. rule 391, nor is further notice of this ruling required.         
                                                                             



     Department 54
     March 11, 2003
     Page  3
     ______________


     ***

     ITEM  5  02AS07912 COLETTE A. THOMPSON VS. GERALD GOLDBERG, ET AL              
              Nature of Proceeding: Demurrer                           
              Filed By: GUNN, ANDREA M.                               


     The general and special demurrers by Golden 1 to the entire complaint is
     sustained without leave to amend.  Plaintiff fails to state causes of   
     action for abuse of process, unlawful debt collection, unfair business  
     practice or injunctive relief and her allegations are also uncertain.   
                                                                             
     Based on the ruling above, the motion to strike is moot.                
                                                                             
     This minute order is effective immediately.  No formal order is needed, 
     C.R.C. rule 391, nor is further notice of this ruling required.         

     ***

     ITEM  6  03CS00104 IN RE:  JORDAN L. CAHALAN                                   
              Nature of Proceeding: Petition For Change Of Name        
              Filed By: CAHALAN, JORDAN L.                               


     The Petition for Change of Name is granted.                             
                                                                             

     ***

     ITEM  7  02AM05906 NO CAL COLL SERV. INC. VS. RICK SANFORD, ET AL              
              Nature of Proceeding: MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT            
              Filed By: MONTAGUE, JOHN D.                               


     The motion is granted, no opposition having been received by the Court. 
                                                                             
     Defendant to file and serve his answer no later than Thursday, March 13,
     2003.                                                                   
                                                                             
     This minute order is effective immediately.  No formal order is needed, 
     C.R.C. rule 391, nor is further notice of this ruling required.         
                                                                             



     Department 54
     March 11, 2003
     Page  4
     ______________


     ***

     ITEM  8  02AM08036 HOWARD MARCUS VS. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ETAL 
              Nature of Proceeding: MT TO CRT REQ ORD TO GRT DEF TO ANS COMP WITHIN 20 DAYS     
              Filed By: MARCUS, HOWARD                               


     Defendant filed a motion requiring plaintiff to furnish security        
     pursuant to C.C.P.  391.1.  Once the motion is made, the litigation is 
     stayed until 10 days after the motion shall have been denied, or if     
     granted, until 10 days after the required security has been furnished   
     and the moving defendant given written notice thereof.  The Court       
     therefore will not rule on plaintiff's motions until after it has ruled 
     on defendant's motion.  If denied, the Court will reschedule plaintiff's
     motions and the parties will be given appropriate notice.               
                                                                             
     This minute order is effective immediately.  No formal order is needed, 
     C.R.C. Rule 391.  Defendant to serve plaintiff with notice of this      
     ruling.                                                                 
                                                                             

     ***

     ITEM  9  02AM10368 CHRISTOPHER LAZZARINI, ETAL VS. CA MOTO FUNERAL ESCORT,ETAL 
              Nature of Proceeding: Motion To Compel                   
              Filed By: FUTERMAN, SHARON B.                               


     The motion is granted, no opposition having been received by the Court. 
                                                                             
     Plaintiffs are ordered to serve verified responses, without objections, 
     to defendants' Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories and        
     Requests for Production of Documents, sets one, no later than Friday,   
     March 21, 2003.                                                         
                                                                             
     The request for a monetary sanction is denied as the motion is          
     unopposed.                                                              
                                                                             
     This minute order is effective immediately.  No formal order is needed, 
     C.R.C. rule 391, nor is further notice of this ruling required.         
                                                                             

     ***