Tentative Rulings Department 54 of California March 01, 2000




                                        NOTICE                               
                                                                             
              To request a hearing on any matter on this                    
     calendar, you must call the Court at (916) 874-7848                    
     (Department 54) by 4:30 p.m. today. Local rule 31(h). If               
     no call is made the tentative ruling becomes the order of              
     the court.                                                              


                               TENTATIVE RULINGS                         

                                 Department  54
                          Superior Court of California              
                                  800 H Street                              
                               Joe S. Gray, Judge
                               Peggy Allen, Clerk
                           R. Sanchez-Jacobo, Bailiff
                             March  1, 2000, 09:00

     ITEM  1  00AS00028 BANKERS LEASING CORP. OF ST. PAUL VS. PATRIZIA BOLTON,ETAL  
              Nature of Proceeding: WRIT OF ATTACHMENT(2)/POSSESSION   
              Filed By: SPIWAK, LISA E.                               


     The applications for writs of attachment and writs of possession are    
     granted as prayed.  The writs of attachment are granted on condition    
     plaintiff files two bonds of $7,500, one for Patrizia Bolton and one for
     Ronald Bolton.  No bonds will be required prior to issuance of the writs
     of possession.                                                          

     ***

     ITEM  2  00CS00204 PAULETTE REISSMAN VS. FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP               
              Nature of Proceeding: MOTION TO COMPEL                   
              Filed By: REISSMAN, PAULETTE                               


     The petition is granted, since both petitioner and respondent agree the 
     matter should be arbitrated.  Mr. David W. Falconer is appointed the    
     neutral arbitrator, again based on the agreement of both petitioner and 
     respondent.                                                             
                                                                             
                                                                             

     ***

     ITEM  3  98AS01088 DIANE BROCCHI, ET AL VS. CHARLES DUNN COMPANY, ET AL        
              Nature of Proceeding: MOT RELEIVE DEF REQ PURS CCP1985.6(B)                       
              Filed By: WALLIS, DAVID A.                               


     The motion is granted conditionally.  Kaiser may either release the     
     employees names, last known addresses and California driver's license   
     numbers only, or Kaiser may elect to personally serve, at their own     
     expense, the notice to employees required by the code.                  



     Department 54
     March  1, 2000
     Page  2
     ______________


     ***

     ITEM  4  98AS02452 RUFUS A. SPEAKS, III VS. ALBERT HAGEMYER, ET AL             
              Nature of Proceeding: MOTION TO WITHDRAW ATTY OF REC     
              Filed By: COHN, DONA E.                               


     The motion to withdraw is granted.  The Court will sign the order       
     submitted with the motion.                                              

     ***

     ITEM  5  98AS03802 MANUEL R. MARTINEZ VS. LESLIE BERNSTEIN, ET LA              
              Nature of Proceeding: MOTION FOR ORDER AWARDING ATTY FEES                         
              Filed By: BERSTEIN, RICHARD P.                               


     The motion is granted.  The fees charged, and the amount spent in       
     defending the case appear reasonable.  Defendants are awarded their     
     attorneys fees and costs in defending this matter in the amount of      
     $37,005.00.                                                             
                                                                             
     This minute order is effective immediately.  No formal order per C.R.C. 
     rule 391 is needed, however defendants are to notify plaintiff of the   
     Court's ruling forthwith.                                               

     ***

     ITEM  6  98AS05900 CMSH ELECTRICAL, INC. VS. STONE-CHENEY CONST. CO INC., ET AL
              Nature of Proceeding: MOTION TO COMPEL                   
              Filed By: HARMATA, DONALD D.                               


     Dropped. 

                                                                             
                                                                             

     ***

     ITEM  7  99AS01033 GIUSEPPINA WEBER, ET AL VS. SAMUEL MARK JONES, ET AL        
              Nature of Proceeding: MOTION TO WITHDRAW ATTY OF REC     
              Filed By: HENK, ROBERT P.                               


     Case transferred to Department 53

                                                                             
                                                                             



     Department 54
     March  1, 2000
     Page  3
     ______________


     ***

     ITEM  8  99AS02496 DORIS HAMILTON VS. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL
              Nature of Proceeding: MOTION TO WITHDRAW ATTY OF REC     
              Filed By: HENK, ROBERT P.                               


     The motion to withdraw as counsel of record is granted on condition the 
     law firm files an amended declaration in department 54, no later than   
     Wednesday, March 1st, 2000, which complies with the requirements of     
     C.R.C. rule 376(c).  The declaration must contain facts, not            
     conclusions, showing the service address is the client's current address
     or last known address.  If the latter, then service on the Clerk of the 
     Court must be made.  See C.R.C. rules 376(c), 202.5, and C.C.P.        
     1011(b).  Counsel should also submit an order, on the date set forth    
     above, which complies with C.R.C. rule 376(d).                          
                                                                             
     If the amended declaration is sufficient, and the order is signed,      
     Counsel will continue to be the attorney of record until notice is      
     given, and the order is served, pursuant to C.C.P.  285 and C.R.C. rule
     376(d).                                                                 
                                                                             
     This minute order is effective immediately.                             

     ***

     ITEM  9  99AS02644 EMORY G. WEST VS. ANTONIO PREVEDELLO, ET AL                 
              Nature of Proceeding:                                                             
              Filed By:                                


     The motion to lift the stay is granted.  The parties have spent         
     considerable time and paper discussing the issue of whether defendants  
     have waived the right to arbitrate.  That is irrelevant to the issue    
     before the court.  The court must determine, on the state of the record 
     as it exists now, whether the stay should be lifted.  Any conduct by the
     parties undertaken as a result of the ruling of the Court may be        
     relevant to future motions, but is not relevant to this motion.  At the 
     present time, the only parties who petitioned for arbitration have been 
     dismissed.  A stay of the action is therefore no longer needed.         
                                                                             
     This minute order is effective immediately.  No formal order per C.R.C. 
     rule 391 is needed, nor is further notice of this ruling required.      



     Department 54
     March  1, 2000
     Page  4
     ______________


     ***

     ITEM 10  99AS04362 BOBBY RAY VANBIBER VS. CLINTON EDWARD SHOWALTER, ET AL      
              Nature of Proceeding: MOTION TO WITHDRAW ATTY OF REC     
              Filed By: ESQUINA, LEONARD                               


     The motion to withdraw as counsel of record is dropped from the Court's 
     calendar.  The declaration of counsel makes it quite clear that the     
     service address is the client's last known address and the attorney has 
     been unable to locate a more current address.  C.R.C. rule 376(c).  The 
     motion should therefore have been served on the Clerk of the Court.  See
     C.R.C. rules 376(d), 202.5 and C.C.P.  1011(b).                        

     ***

     ITEM 11  99AS05133 CHRISTINE KIM-LAN NGUYEN VS PAUL JAMES DONALD M.D., ET AL   
              Nature of Proceeding: MOTION TO COMPEL                   
              Filed By: SHEEHAN, NANCY J.                               


     Case transferred to Department 53

                                                                             
                                                                             

     ***

     ITEM 12  99AS05256 ROY ZATTIERO VS. SILVIO PEREA, ET AL                        
              Nature of Proceeding: MOTION FOR SANCTIONS                                        
              Filed By: ZATTIERO, ROY                               


     Plaintiff's motion is dropped from the Court's calendar.  The motion was
     served with only 23 days notice, instead of the 26 days required by     
     C.C.P.  1005.  Defective notice deprives the Court of jurisdiction to  
     rule on the matter.  Lee v Placer Title Co. (1994) 28 C.A.4th 503, 509, 
     511.                                                                    

     ***

     ITEM 13  98AM09426 KATHLEEN MCKINNEY VS. CHADWICK BUFORD, ET AL                
              Nature of Proceeding: MOTION TO COMPEL                   
              Filed By: LEWIS, LUTHER R.                               


     Defendants' motion is granted.  Plaintiff is ordered to appear for her  
     deposition at the law office of Correll & Associates, 3013 Douglas      
     Blvd., Suite 220, Roseville, Ca., 95661, on Wednesday, March 29th, 2000,
     at 10:00 a.m.  Plaintiff shall also produce, at that time and place, all
     non-privileged documents, as requested, in the deposition notice dated  
     January 3rd, 2000.                                                      
                                                                             
     This minute order is effective immediately.  No formal order per C.R.C.,
     rule 391 is needed, however defense counsel is to notify plaintiff of   
     the Court's ruling forthwith.                                           
                                                                             
                                                                             



     Department 54
     March  1, 2000
     Page  5
     ______________


     ***

     ITEM 14  99AM03972 GENTRY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES VS. HOSSEIN G. TAHRANI, ET AL   
              Nature of Proceeding: DEFAULT HEARING                    
              Filed By: ZAL, CYRUS                               


     Continued to 03/21/2000

     Appearance required.  The Court will exercise its discretion and grant a
     several judgment in this case, if warranted by the evidence presented.  

     ***

     ITEM 15  99AM06726 FOOD KING VS. KIMBERLY HILLARD                              
              Nature of Proceeding: CLAIM OF EXEMPTION                                          
              Filed By: STASSTINOS, PAUL                               


     Dropped. 

                                                                             
                                                                             

     ***