Tentative Rulings Department 54 of California January 19, 2000




                                        NOTICE                               
                                                                             
              To request a hearing on any matter on this                    
     calendar, you must call the Court at (916) 874-7848                    
     (Department 54) by 4:30 p.m. today. Local rule 31(h). If               
     no call is made the tentative ruling becomes the order of              
     the court.                                                              


                               TENTATIVE RULINGS                         

                                 Department  54
                          Superior Court of California              
                                  800 H Street                              
                               Joe S. Gray, Judge
                              Barbara Baldy, Clerk
                           R. Sanchez-Jacobo, Bailiff
                            January 19, 2000, 09:00

     ITEM  1  98AS01404 MARTIN EDWARDS VS. LESTER SIMMONS, ET AL                    
              Nature of Proceeding: MOT. FOR PROTEC ORD/SANCTIONS/MOT. APPT REF/DEPO/SANCTIONS  
              Filed By: WANDLAND, DONALD M.                               


     Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of a discovery referee is denied.
     Mr. Zinicola's deposition is ordered to go forward on Thursday, January 
     20th, 2000.  No sanctions can be awarded against defendants as the      
     declarations of Mr. Smith do not contain any evidence regarding the     
     number of hours spent on the motion or his hourly rate.  The only       
     reference to this information is in the memorandum of points and        
     authorities, which is not evidence.                                     
                                                                             
     Defendants' motion for a protective order is denied.  Plaintiff's       
     request for sanctions in opposing the motion is denied for the reason   
     stated in the motion for appointment of a discovery referee.            
                                                                             
     This minute order is effective immediately.  No formal order per C.R.C. 
     rule 391 is needed, nor is further notice of this ruling required.      

     ***

     ITEM  2  98AS04836 BALWINDER SINGH, ET AL VS. GROCERS INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL 
              Nature of Proceeding: MOTION TO WITHDRAW ATTY OF REC     
              Filed By: MOORE, PATRICK L.                               


     The motion to withdraw is granted.  Schofield & Schiller will no longer 
     be the attorney of record once notice is given and the order is served, 
     as set forth in C.C.P.  285 and C.R.C. rule 376(d).  The order need not
     be served on the clerk, but may be served on the former client, at his  
     last known business and residence addresses.                            



     Department 54
     January 19, 2000
     Page  2
     ________________


     ***

     ITEM  3  98AS05700 CRAIG MCINTOSH, ET AL VS. H.C. ELLIOT HOMES, INC.           
              Nature of Proceeding: MOTION TO APPOINT SPEC MASTER/JOINDER                       
              Filed By: JACOBSEN, KAREN L.                               


     The motion to appoint a special master is granted.  Joseph Ramsey is    
     appointed the special master.  The special master shall have the duties 
     and powers set forth in the moving papers at page 7.  Defendant is      
     ordered to prepare an order for the Court's signature which includes the
     duties and powers of the special master and present it to department 54 
     for signature no later than Wednesday, January 19th, 2000.              

     ***

     ITEM  4  99AS00092 DEBRA A. HUGHES VS COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP.                   
              Nature of Proceeding: MOT. TO VAC/SET ASIDE ORD JUDG     
              Filed By: HAYES, SUSAN E.                               


     Due to the unique procedural posture of this case, the Court deems the  
     motion to be a motion for relief from failure to file a request for     
     trial de novo in a timely manner.  It is obvious from reading the       
     declarations submitted in support of and in opposition to the motion    
     that the request for trial de novo was not submitted timely, and that   
     the failure to submit it timely was due to mistake, inadvertence or     
     excusable neglect.  C.C.P  1141.23, 473 and C.R.C. rule 1615(d).  The 
     judgment is therefore vacated and this matter is put back on the civil  
     active list as of the date the request for trial de novo was filed,     
     November 15, 1999.  The order of December 21, 1999, is therefore vacated
     also.                                                                   
                                                                             
     Defendant is to pay plaintiff $23 for plaintiff having to file the      
     motion to correct a mistake of defendant's making.                      
                                                                             
     This minute order is effective immediately.  No formal order per C.R.C. 
     rule 391 is needed, nor is further notice of this ruling required.      
                                                                             
     If a hearing is requested, the parties are to call 874-7584, department 
     39, Judge Cecil, for information.                                       

     ***



     Department 54
     January 19, 2000
     Page  3
     ________________

     ITEM  5  99AS03588 LESTER A. SIMMONS, ET AL VS. SUPERIOR NAT. INS., ET AL      
              Nature of Proceeding: MOTION TO STRIKE                                            
              Filed By: O'CONNELL, GEORGE L.                               


     Plaintiff's motion to strike is denied.  Plaintiff's motion to tax is   
     granted.  Defendant's motion for attorney fees and costs is granted.    
     The Court finds that $31,000 is a reasonable amount for attorney fees   
     for the Special Motion to Strike.                                       
                                                                             
     This minute order is effective immediately.  No formal order per C.R.C. 
     rule 391 is needed, nor is further notice of this ruling required.      

     ***

     ITEM  6  99AS04676 CASCADES RESIDENTIAL OWNERS ASSO. VS. H.C. ELLIOT, INC      
              Nature of Proceeding: MOTION TO APPT SPEC MASTER/JOINDER                          
              Filed By: JACOBSEN, KAREN L.                               


     See item #3.                                                            
                                                                             

     ***

     ITEM  7  99AM00648 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA COLLECTION SERV, INC. VS. MARK PEARSON  
              Nature of Proceeding: CLAIM OF EXEMPTION                                          
              Filed By: ANDERSON, MARTY                               


     Dropped. 

                                                                             
                                                                             

     ***