Tentative Rulings Department 54 of California January 11, 2000




                                        NOTICE                               
                                                                             
              To request a hearing on any matter on this                    
     calendar, you must call the Court at (916) 874-7848                    
     (Department 54) by 4:30 p.m. today. Local rule 31(h). If               
     no call is made the tentative ruling becomes the order of              
     the court.                                                              


                               TENTATIVE RULINGS                         

                                 Department  54
                          Superior Court of California              
                                  800 H Street                              
                             Thomas M. Cecil, Judge
                              Barbara Baldy, Clerk
                           R. Sanchez-Jacobo, Bailiff
                            January 11, 2000, 09:00

     ITEM  1  98AS03148 FUAD PHILIP GABRIEL VS. BRET A. DONALDSON, ET AL            
              Nature of Proceeding: SUMMARY JUDGMENT (2)               
              Filed By: HIRSIG, PETER J.                               


     Continued to 01/14/2000

                                                                             
                                                                             

     ***

     ITEM  2  98AS03524 SHANNON LORENE TOLIVER VS. REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF CA, ET AL 
              Nature of Proceeding: SUMMARY JUDGMENT                   
              Filed By: CORR, JONATHAN A.                               


     Continued to 02/18/2000

                                                                             
                                                                             

     ***

     ITEM  3  98AS05956 MARY KAY FIFFICK VS. JILIAN N. REIDEL                       
              Nature of Proceeding: MOTION TO COMPEL                   
              Filed By: CLAUSS, PAUL C.ESQ                               


     Dropped. 

                                                                             
                                                                             



     Department 54
     January 11, 2000
     Page  2
     ________________


     ***

     ITEM  4  98AS06262 DMITRY MELNIK VS. MELINDA BROWN                             
              Nature of Proceeding: MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION ORDER 
              Filed By: SAMELSON, LAWRENCE D. ESQ                               


         This matter is dropped from calendar as it must be heard by the     
     Court's ACT department.  Moving party should refile the motion in Dept. 
     34 for hearing on any Thursday at 8:30 a.m.  If there is no objection to
     the motion by any party, moving party may file an ex parte application  
     with no appearance required.                                            

     ***

     ITEM  5  99AS01074 CITY OF LODI VS. UNIGARD INSURANCE COMPANY                  
              Nature of Proceeding: MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION    
              Filed By: ZARAGOZA, DENNIS ESQ                               


     Continued to 01/20/2000

                                                                             
                                                                             

     ***

     ITEM  6  99AS03088 MARK MAJOR VS. LAWYER'S MUTUAL INS. CO., ET AL              
              Nature of Proceeding: DEMURRER                           
              Filed By: MEDEIROS, SHERYL C.                               


         The demurrer is unopposed and is sustained without leave to amend   
     for failure to state a cause of action.  The lack of opposition is      
     deemed to be a concession of the merits of the demurrer, and that       
     plaintiff is unable to amend the complaint to state a cause of action.  
         The minute order is effective immediately.  No formal order pursuant
     to CRC rule 391 is required, and no further notice of the order is      
     necessary, except that defendant shall submit a judgment of dismissal.  

     ***



     Department 54
     January 11, 2000
     Page  3
     ________________

     ITEM  7  99AS03566 KORETHA DELA TORRE VS. STATE OF CA., ET AL                  
              Nature of Proceeding: MOT. TO FILE AMENDED COMPALINT     
              Filed By: SALISBURY, LAWRENCE                               


         Plaintiff's motion for leave to file third amended complaint is     
     unopposed and is granted.                                               
         Plaintiff shall file the proposed third amended complaint           
     accompanying the moving papers no later than January 21, 2000.          
         The minute order is effective immediately.  No formal order pursuant
     to CRC Rule 391 is required, and no further notice of the order is      
     necessary.                                                              
                                                                             

     ***

     ITEM  8  99AS04228 UNITED RENTALS, INC. VS. TERRY R. BROUGHTON, ET AL          
              Nature of Proceeding: MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS 
              Filed By: PARSHALL, STEPHAN L.                               


         The motion to quash is unopposed and is granted.  The undisputed    
     evidence before the Court establishes that defendant Richard D.         
     Kollenberg is not a general partner of defendant Midway Construction and
     he is not authorized to accept service on behalf of defendant Midway    
     Construction.  The summons and complaint served on Richard D. Kollenberg
     as a general partner on behalf of Midway Construction, a California     
     partnership, is hereby quashed.                                         
         The minute order is effective immediately.  No formal order pursuant
     to CRC Rule 391 is required, and no further notice of the order is      
     necessary.                                                              

     ***

     ITEM  9  99AS05310 LARRY DEBOIARD, ET AL VS JOSEPH MYERS, ET AL                
              Nature of Proceeding: MOTION TO COMPEL                   
              Filed By: WOO, PEGGY L.                               


     Dropped. 

                                                                             
                                                                             



     Department 54
     January 11, 2000
     Page  4
     ________________


     ***

     ITEM 10  99CS02500 IN RE: PRESTON A. ALLEN-JONES                               
              Nature of Proceeding: PETITION FOR CHANGE OF NAME        
              Filed By: ALLEN-JONES, PRESTON A.                               


         The petition is unopposed and is granted.                           
                                                                             

     ***

     ITEM 11  99CS02504 IN RE: CARL WESLEY BARNES, ET AL                            
              Nature of Proceeding: Petition For Change Of Name        
              Filed By:                                


         The petition is unopposed and is granted.                           
                                                                             

     ***

     ITEM 12  99CS02508 IN RE: BYRON LAMAAR WATSON JR.                              
              Nature of Proceeding: Petition For Change Of Name        
              Filed By:                                


         The petition is unopposed and is granted.                           
                                                                             

     ***

     ITEM 13  97AM08406 ANDREA WARREN-WEEMS VS. ALLEN WAYNE WARREN                  
              Nature of Proceeding: MOT. FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT                                  
              Filed By: MARTIN, THOMAS W.                               


         Plaintiff's motion for entry of judgment pursuant to terms of       
     stipulated settlement is unopposed and is granted.  Plaintiff shall     
     submit a formal judgment for the Court's signature.                     

     ***